Sunday, 16 July 2017

Exposing the Pernicious Feminism that Has Taken Over Even the Conservative, Orthodox Evangelical Fundamentalist Church

Dalrock's blog at https://dalrock.wordpress.com/ is an must-read for all Christians, men and women, serious about obeying God-given gender roles, in the context of family, church and society. 

His writings provide an in-depth critical expose into how feminism has devastated the modern Church in the west, which is not only too fearful to rightly proclaim God's Word on gender roles. It unjustly and perversely thinks the wife is always innocent, while the husband is always somewhat at fault whenever a divorce occurs.

 He writes with no fear, and will rightly rebuke on this blog those who attack God's Word.

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

The Misery of Promiscuity and the False Idea of Women's "Choice" in Marrying

The modern west becomes more and more insane each day. It is horribly sick in the head. The average westerner needs serious emotional, psychological and spiritual counseling. However, this sickness is not a recent one which only started from the beginning of the 21st century. No, it has been going on since the 18th century so-called "enlightenment".

One of the diseases which has plagued the west since the heyday of the "enlightenment" era is the so-called 'free love' movement, which has sadly destroyed the west and caused heartbreak in millions who heeded the lies of the 'free love' movement. One woman who grew up in the 1960s writes of her regret and the misery of promiscuity:


To make things worse, there were two added factors that made promiscuity so difficult to avoid. Firstly, there was very little awareness of sexually transmitted diseases – HIV wasn’t yet an issue – and very few men, now that the pill was on the scene, had any clue about how to put on a condom. Again, there was even less reason to say ‘no’ to sex, and the result was that lots of us girls spent the entire 60s in tears, because however one tried to separate sex from love, we’d been brought up to associate the two; so every time we went to bed with someone, we’d hope it would lead to something more permanent…and each time it never did. 

The other reason that sex was so grim was that now it was so easy, the art of seduction had flown out of the window. I’m sure this was partly why working-class men became so much more attractive to everyone in the 60s. They’d always found, with less birth control available among the working classes and expensive abortion  not an option, that in order to get a girl into bed they had to work really hard at the  chat-up lines. But as for men considering women’s feelings – why should they? 

They continued to satisfy their own needs and never for a moment considered whether the women they were having sex with found it pleasurable or satisfying. Most of us girls, at least those on the London rock scene as I was, didn’t have a clue as to what sex could be like when it was good. When we weren’t crying, we’d giggle, like the schoolgirls we were, about our exploits, without realising how damaging our sexual behaviour was both to our self-esteem and our souls.


Not every girl behaved quite as I did, but most came under the same kinds of pressures and few can have missed out on the occasional bleak and ghastly ‘one-night stand’, a phrase that simply didn’t exist for my parents’ generation.

After a decade of sleeping around pretty indiscriminately, girls of the 60s eventually became fairly jaded about sex. It took me years to discover that continual sex with different partners is, with very few exceptions, joyless, uncomfortable and humiliating, and it’s only now I’m older that I’ve discovered that one of the ingredients of a good sex life is, at the very least, a grain of affection between the two partners involved.

Would I go back to the swinging 60s? Never! 

Indeed, she emphatically states that she would never want to go back to the "swinging 60s". 

The misery of promiscuity is the result of disobeying God, perverting his design for sex in separating sex and marriage. Ironically, this feminist rebellion, despite its claims to 'empower' woman, has depreciated her sexual value to men, in encouraging her to prostitute herself. One could argue that this is evidence of God's design of man's dominion over woman as one which cannot be overthrown. In Genesis 2:21-25, Eve is created from Adam, and Adam names her, meaning that he has dominion over her:

And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

Any attempts to overthrow or perverts God's design will fail, and fail miserably.

Women is subject to man, as not only indicated by his naming of her, but also that he is the one who is given the responsibility to leave his father and mother, and cleave unto his wife. It is not the woman who is the one who is commanded to leave her father and mother. Thus, where a woman actively seeks love from men, it is unbiblical. That it is unbibilical is indicated by the promiscuity which comes when women pursue men for romantic relationships. 

The idea that woman can led man in pursuing a romantic relationship is based on the false idea of "choice", that a woman who "choose" who she wants to marry, and to decide whether she wants to marry. No where in the Bible does a woman pursue or initiate a God-ordained romantic relationship. It is only the whore in Proverbs 5 and 7 who pursues such relationships.

However, this is precisely the warped view of modern western society which has influenced the Church so much. Rather, it is for God to determine whether a woman, or more generally, a person marries, and who He marries together.

Mark 10:9 says in relation to the issue of divorce, "What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder." Matthew 19: 6 similarly says "Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder."

While it is not for man who choose who he marries but God, he is the one who has the responsibility to pursue as Genesis 2:24 indicates.

The whole idea of women "choosing" who she 'wants' to marry is a perversion of the God-given order of headship and submission, and is itself promiscuity. It is promiscuity because she is rebelling against God in relation to matters of sexual boundaries which God has determined.

A woman who actively pursues and initiates romantic relationships with men is a whore. She is like the woman in Proverbs 5 and 7. Run from her immediately. Her lips drip with honey but she is as bitter as wormwood.

My son, attend unto my wisdom, and bow thine ear to my understanding: 
That thou mayest regard discretion, and that thy lips may keep knowledge.
For the lips of a strange woman drop as an honeycomb, and her mouth is smoother than oil:
But her end is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword.
Her feet go down to death; her steps take hold on hell.
Lest thou shouldest ponder the path of life, her ways are moveable, that thou canst not know them.
Hear me now therefore, O ye children, and depart not from the words of my mouth. Remove thy way far from her, and come not nigh the door of her house:
Lest thou give thine honour unto others, and thy years unto the cruel:
Lest strangers be filled with thy wealth; and thy labours be in the house of a stranger;
And thou mourn at the last, when thy flesh and thy body are consumed,
And say, How have I hated instruction, and my heart despised reproof;
And have not obeyed the voice of my teachers, nor inclined mine ear to them that instructed me!
I was almost in all evil in the midst of the congregation and assembly.

(Proverbs 5:1-14)









Tuesday, 11 July 2017

Reworking Malachi 2:16 for our feminist era

God hates divorce, full stop, because it is to break the marriage covenant. He hates it when one spouse seeks the divorce where there are no Biblical grounds, if any exist, that is, usually being the wife. Most wives who divorce seek it because the husband did not "give them enough money to spend", make them "happy", became injured and could no longer play sport with them, or did not spend enough money on them. 

This is true. I am not making it up. This is just how evil most women are.

Tragically, Malachi 2:16 has been perverted by evil demonic feminised professing 'christians' (who are not even christians) to mean that God hates divorce, not because of the wife seeking the divorce, but because of the husband by making her 'upset' or 'offended'. What a vile despicable perversion!

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2016/10/05/reworking-malachi-216-for-our-feminist-era-part-1/

https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2016/10/06/reworking-malachi-216-for-our-feminist-era-part-2/

Heretics who pervert the meaning of Malachi 2:16 are under the wrath of God. They will answer to God one day for their heresy.

THEY need to repent.

Thursday, 6 July 2017

The Perversion of Needs as Wants is the Manifestation of Self-glory, Self-worship and Pride

There is a difference between wants and needs. A want is that which one merely desires but is not needed to remain a living human being, and to serve God. A need is that which one must have to remain alive as a living human being, and therefore to serve God.

Thus, whether something is a want or need is determined by reference to whether it is needed to serve God for His glory. This is because humans exist for the purpose of glorifying God, and not ourselves. We are to live for Him, and not ourselves:

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them (Genesis 1:27).

Even every one that is called by my name: for I have created him for my glory, I have formed him; yea, I have made him (Isaiah 43:7).

Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man (Ecclesiastes 12:13).
 

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created (Revelation 4:11).

There are many legitimate needs and desires that people have, such as the desire for food and sex.

So, what one needs must be for the purpose of glorifying God. Of course, what a need is can be indulged in for self-centred ways that are not done to glorify God. Such is the way of greed for legitimate needs such as food. When one eats, not to glorify God, but  to self-indulge, one perverts what is a need into a want.

This perversion of a need into a want is itself a sin, being the manifestation of self-exultation and self-worship, the root of which is pride. It is to worship mammon, as one by default serves mammon when one serves one's own needs, so as to pervert such needs into wants. Serving one's needs is itself the failure to serve God, as serving one's needs is to serve oneself.

To serve one's needs is different from having one's needs met as a means to serve God. A Christian is totally liberated from serving his needs as God provides. He needs only to seek first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness. God makes it His duty to provide when a Christian seeks first His Kingdom and His righteousness:

Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
 
Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?

(For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
 
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof  

(Matthew 6:30-34).

The perversion of needs as wants is an extremely dangerous one. It is slavery to one's needs, coming from a selfish pursuit of one's needs, such that those needs are used to serve oneself, instead of as an means to serve God. Not only does that put such a person in spiritual bondage. It places a man whose primary obligation is to provide for his family's needs into spiritual bondage, by twisting it into an obligation to provide for their wants (Genesis 3:17-19; 1 Timothy 5:8; Ephesians 5:23-25). 

That is another issue which will be examined in another article, and which is argued to be one main causes of family breakdown, that is, financial strain or dispute. It is one of the main forms of manipulation that wives and children use against their husbands and fathers or parents more generally, respectively.

Such is the way of self-exultation and self-worship where one seeks one's needs, instead of fully relying on God to provide.
 





Thursday, 29 June 2017

The Need to Absolutely Confront, Eradicate and Root out Feminism in feminised Church in the West

Many in the modern Church in the west are full of the fear of people. They are terrified of criticising anyone, except of course, those who point out that they are full of the fear of people, and expose this sinful fear of theirs to them.

In particular, the modern Church in the west is absolutely terrified of exposing sins specific o women. And there are many such sins committed by women. I mince no words on this. 

The sins of women in the Church against her husband in the west today include:


  • Nagging her husband
  • Criticising him
  • Gossiping about him to his friends
  • Slandering him in front of her children, or friends, either at work, clubs, or at women's Bible study groups
  • Slapping him 
  • Committing adultery, and being proud of it
  • Taking abortifacient birth control pills to murder his children in the womb
  • Abusing his children to manipulate him
  • Spending money in a spendthrift way, causing him to be in debt, enslaving him to debt
  • Making unfair accusation against him, for not "being for her". This includes accusing him of being 'abusive' when he screams at the children, but yet at the same time mocks his lack of leadership when he is kind to the children.
  • Sexual denial 
  • Stopping him from seeing his parents
  • Threatening to cause him to become bankrupt, and possibly imprisoned because of bankruptcy
  • Threatening to divorce him, because of a mere personal offence caused to her
  • Threatening to abuse the children sexually if he does not agree to give her child custody after a divorce
  • Threatening to murder him and his children if she does not receive a lavish payout, a house and children, who she can abuse emotionally and psychologically
  • Throwing a tantrum when she is rightly rebuked for her sins
This is only a list of some examples of sins by women in the modern world, and sadly the modern Church against her husband. I can give a whole bucket list. Yet, all these sins are somewhat deemed by so many in the modern Church in the west to be partially the fault of the husband. Even many Christian counsellors and pastors think that such sins in women are either partially or fully the fault of their husbands. That is in and of itself extremely disturbing and perverse. It is no wonder that so many men are suspicious of women, and rightly so.

Suspicion is not a sin in itself, but rather evil suspicion (1 Corinthians 13:6-7; 1 Timothy 6:4). So, such suspicion of the evils of women is not an evil suspicion, but a justified and righteous suspicion, and seeking to live holy and righteous, not being snared by woman because of the desire to marry.

While marriage can be good, it can be a snare spiritually. This is particularly the case for men, as he is the one influenced by his wife, either for better or for worse. However, based on what can be observed, it is almost always the case that he is influenced by his wife for worse. One only need to look at the example of Solomon: 

Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? yet among many nations was there no king like him, who was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel: nevertheless even him did outlandish women cause to sin (Nehemiah 13:26).


Note how it says they "caused him to sin". They are responsible for his sins, by causing him to.

However, this is not to say that there is no such thing as a good wife, or that all women are just evil despicable jezebels who are deserving of all hatred. I am not saying this just to be 'positive' (I am not a positive optimistic person), but rather, because it is something that can also be observed. But, it needs to be absolutely said that the vast majority of wives today are jezebels, foolish evil jezebels who are nothing but a curse to their husbands, children, parents, and everyone else around them.

Owing to the cause of marriage problems in the Church today being that of the wife, the Church must really see the problem for what it really is, be courageous, hate that which is evil, and confront such sins in wives today.  This is because they corrupt not only their families, causing their husbands and children to sin, but also corrupt their whole Church by their rebellion, and their demand to not rebuke sin in the way it is to be Biblically confronted

The way sin to be Biblically confronted is not by simply persuading a person to not sin, or by being "understanding". Such is the manifestation of feminism in the Church, to simply be "undestanding" of sin, and to refuse to exercise discipline, because it might "upset" or "offend" people. To confront sin Biblically is to exercise judgment against the person, pointing out his or her sin to him or her, how he or she is in sin by referring to Biblical teaching violated, and telling the person to repent. This is indicated in Luke 17:3 and Matthew 18:15-17.

If the person is "upset" or "offended", let them be upset and offended. For why should you, or rather, how dare you compromise the Word of God, or compromise with sin, pandering to the carnality of sin in sinners? By pandering to such carnality, one not only invites sin into the Church, but to impose sin onto people for maintaining 'unity' and showing 'love'. Such people may think they are 'peace-makers' but peace-makers they are not. Rather, they cause others who seek to be righteous and not compromise with sin to stumble and be snared in their quest to seek false unity, all to pander to the carnality of sinners.

This is precisely the problem of the modern Church in relation to sins it does not want to confront, or even recognise as sins, such as the sins of women against their husbands as listed above. 

So, what is the solution to the confronting, eradicating and rooting out feminism in the Church?

First, one need to rightly understand such sins for what they are. Rebellion by a wife against a husband is always despicable, and always only the tip of an iceberg. It should be treated as not just evil or concerning, but as an absolutely anathema to the Christian faith. Given the permissiveness of the modern Church towards such rebellion, the Church leadership needs to be all the more hard on wives' rebellion and preach harder, tougher and stricter on wives' submission. This is because of the great extent of such rebellion and the approval give to it, even by pastors of conservative, fundamentalist, evangelical churches. 

Secondly, all in the Church must learn to truly despise not only feminism, in all its forms, not just in the modern form. It must also despite absolutely all manifestations of it, such as a wife nagging her husband, criticising, gossiping or slandering him, and rebuke such actions.

Thirdly, Christian pastors and counsellors must not in any way assume automatically that the wife is the victim, or that if she is not happy, it is always somehow because the husband has sinned. They must root out and viciously eradicate such vile and despicable assumptions, such evil suspicion. They must pray for wisdom to judge righteously, and cast away all evil suspicions, which overthrows righteous judgment:

Give therefore thy servant an understanding heart to judge thy people, that I may discern between good and bad: for who is able to judge this thy so great a people? (1 Kings 3:9)


Give me now wisdom and knowledge, that I may go out and come in before this people: for who can judge this thy people, that is so great? (2 Chronicles 1:10)


If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him (James 1:5)


Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.
But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.
This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.
For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.
(James 3:13-18)

As James 3:13-18 exhorts, seek the wisdom of God, and reject the 'wisdom' of the world. The 'wisdom' of the world, which is that adopted by many 'christian' counsellors (which is another subject altogether), is that which produces nothing but envying, strife, confusion and every evil work, because it is not founded to the truth (James 3:14-16).

A large part of the problem is that the modern Church has tolerated so much worldly wisdom, all without knowing its spiritual damage. It tolerates so much of what the unsaved tolerate, that it tolerates its evils even more than the unsaved in many cases. For example, it tolerates feminism more than some unsaved people, many of whom have had enough of it, and hate feminism with a passion because of its devastating impact of their marriage, family and finances, owing to its perversion.

So, rejecting all feminist ideas, and products thereof in full, is, I believe, is half the battle. That is a cause for hope, as the battle is a spiritual one, and largely doctrine. Once this is done, putting it into right practice can be done.

So, do not lose hope in the Church repenting from succumbing to feminism. Rather, pray for her that she may repent of it.

We need to beat the living daylights out of feminism from the Church.


























 





Friday, 23 June 2017

The Satanic Lie of "Free Love" and its Curse to Those who Embrace it

So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
(Ephesians 5:28-32)

Modern western society hates obligations and loves its so-called "freedoms" and "rights". It thinks that people should do whatever they want, and is even arrogant enough to think itself entitled to remove, if not totally eradicate the bad consequences which follow sin. There are a myriad of examples which demonstrate this, not just those relating to sexuality, sex and marriage. This indicates the mentality of the west in relation to anything, not just relation to sex and marriage.

History of Sex, Love and Marriage in the West - a Revolution in the 19th century

Before the 19th century, and even during much of the time during the Enlightenment which was a wicked age, sex outside of marriage was viewed as unacceptable. Of course there were those who practiced fornication, but they had to elope to avoid shame from society. However, by the end of the mid 19th century, the so-called "free love" movement gained traction.

The "free love" movement had its roots in the feminist movement. To be fair, the feminist movement is not solely responsible for this movement and its destruction, although it certainly was largely responsible for it. The feminist, alongside with the new 'sex radical' movement spread their lies about marriage and sex. Their perverted views on marriage, sex, womanhood and manhood are that which dominate 21st century western society today.

These perverted, demonic, and psychopathic men and women behind the "free love" movement had an evil agenda, just like the LGBT activists today who seek to push "transgenderism" and sodomy onto children, even seeking to encourage children as young as eight, usually boys, to become drag queens

These "free lovers", as I will call them, as a derogatory term which they so deserve, campaigned for fornication and adultery. They sought to separate sex and marriage, and in doing so, arguing that there was a "need" on the grounds that sex within marriage restricted a woman's "bodily autonomy". 

This observation is itself very interesting. It is the focus on woman's "bodily autonomy" specifically. This is because woman, in her position as helpmeet is the one who by virtue of her position can break or build up the marriage:

And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
(Genesis 2:18-23)

How? Because man is not complete with her. This is not to say man must be married to be fully human in God's eyes, but rather, that she completes him. That this is the case is not a bad thing. It is a good thing as God made it that way, and all things that God makes is good. That is why Proverbs is filled with Bible verses warning men about the types of wives who are a curse, and for that matter, the children who are a curse to them. It does not talk about the type of husband who is a curse to a wife specifically, or to a child. 

This is because men are the ones who need support for a wife and child in the spiritual sense to be able to lead according to God's way, given the way the family is instituted by God as per Ephesians 5:22-6:4. It is never the reverse. Although he can definitely seek to lead his family despite his opposition, just as Elijah did in facing jezebel, he needs their support, that is, their reverence, obedience and submission to him to satisfy his God-given duty to lead his family. This explains why all family problems start with woman, and her children, in no matter which cultural context or era.

The "Free Love" Movement is an attempt to Undermine Marriage as "One Flesh"

Marriage must necessarily be one flesh (Genesis 2:24; Mark 10:8). It is this idea which these free lovers so hated. The whole purpose of their movement was to attack this doctrine. 

The sex radicals, who are almost all men, if not all men, were liberals who subscribed to the enlightenment philosophy of humanism, secularism and rationalism. They may seem to modern society as 'enlightened' men who loved women, but they were not. They had their own self-seeking agenda in seeking to engage in fornication, adultery and all kinds of sexual immorality. 

The most notorious of the sex radicals is Edward Carpenter, who is known as the first homosexual activist. He had a life-long relationship with George Merrill, his homosexual boyfriend. Carpenter, is arguably, the father of modern sex education in schools, by which he sought to teach that women were oppressed in marriage, because sex could only be within marriage,  in seeking to poison the minds of generations of children. This was a form of "oppression" because women would not have "freedom" to engage in fornication, and adultery, which is itself rebellion against the husband of the adulteress.  

The underlying rationale of this view was that woman had a "right" to rebel. The motive by these sex radicals was to encourage rebellion of women, as they sought to rebel against God, in particular, his order for the family. Owing to her position as helpmeet whereby she is the one who makes or breaks a marriage, the focus must necessarily be on women's autonomy, rather than men's. Men's bodily autonomy follows women's bodily autonomy, rather than that women's bodily autonomy follow men's bodily autonomy, as she is the one under him (no pun intended, if you understand it). The following article is a great article explaining this, which I highly recommend you read, and where the pun was inspired:

https://biblicalgenderroles.com/2016/04/25/benefits-sexually-obedient-wife/ 


By separating sex and marriage, marriage is no longer practiced as a place where sexual bond united husband and wife can be made, and became seen as only something people chose as 'optional'. Since sexual boundaries drawn by marriage were eradicate, sex became that which could be sought outside of marriage. That is the fundamental reason why marriage had been declining in rates, and seen as less important since the 19th century. It is no longer where a sexual intimate relationship needed to be sought, as it could be sought elsewhere.

While this may be disconcerting to those who honour God-given sexual boundaries of marriage, and its role, be encouraged in knowing that God is not mocked. God has allowed all manner of dyfunction in marriage and family to occur as a result of the west proudly rejecting God's commands to humankind in relation to sex, marriage and family. Galatians 6:7-9 makes it clear that God is not mocked, as sin reaps its evil, and righteousness reaps rewards:

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.

If you have ever suffered as a result of another's sin, in relation to sex, marriage or family, know that such persons will reap punishment. You might not be able to see it, but it will happen, because sin will bite back the sinner, like a snake biting those he deceives into seeking him. As the Bible says to the evil "your sin will find you out" (Numbers 32:23).

The bad fruit of the "free love" movement, being single motherhood, abandonment of women by boyfriends, no-fault divorce, the need to divorced women to both work full-time and care for children, abortion, child abuse, and rebellious children who will only turn around to hate their parents who despised the God-given order of family, are all curses. God will indeed not be mocked. Rather, he (or she) who mocks God will be mocked by God himself or herself.






















 















How Woman is the Tempter of Man, and is Woe to Man, and How Children Follow Woman in Undermining Man's Authority as Husband and Father

 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction (Proverbs 1:7).


The western world is totally intoxicated, in a bad way of course, with the idea of freedom, liberty and rights. It thinks everything is a matter of so-called "freedom", "liberty" and "rights". Understanding the evils of such ideas of key to understanding true proper Biblical teaching on marriage, sexuality, sex and gender. 

It thinks itself so wise, but really proves itself to be a fool, with all the social problems in the west, which these people who reject the wisdom of God, and love all kinds of worldly wisdom, are so concerned and angry about.

Why? Because the west has totally prostituted herself to vile liberalism on all matters regarding marriage, sexuality, sex and gender. She thinks that it is man (or woman), not God who determines how these things are to be thought about, and therefore practiced.

A Short History of the West

The west had not always been the way it currently is now. However, this is not to say that history is linear. History is, and always has been cyclic, where although it may not repeat itself exactly, it repeats itself enough to be able to draw parallels between times that are essentially the same, but different in form.

So, the west had in its pagan pre-Christian past been the way it is now - full of sexual immorality, rebellion, idolatry, and barbarism. It supports eugenics, abortion and euthanasia, manifestations of its barbarism, hidden under the guise of 'civility' and 'modernity'. Such evils are all of the spirit of rebellion against God, in rejection the way of Christianity, and therefore loving the ways of darkness.

Christianity fundamentally transformed the west during the Medieval Era from the 5th to 15th centuries. The protestant reformation occurred in the 16th century, following by the "enlightenment era" which originated the mid 16th century, and blossomed by the end of the century.

The Enlightenment Philosophy and its Destruction of the West

The Enlightenment has caused far more destruction that we think. The destruction of the Enlightenment are still felt very strongly in the west today. This manifests itself in literally every single way one can think of, whether it be high crime rates, inability of people to stay married, careerism in women, the hatred of the decent, hardworking husband and father, abortion, euthanasia, religious pluralism, child abuse, and multiculturalism. 

The philosophy underlying these evils is the same philosophy that laid the foundation for the so-called 'free love' movement of the 19th century. Given its militancy and radical changes brought about to the west in relation to marriage and sex, and how often Christians talk about sexuality, sex and marriage, it is surprising not many Christians know much about the free love movement. 

As such, this blog will be examining the free love movement, so that we can see the evil manifestations that result from disobeying God and brazenly rebelling against Him.  The other purpose is to encourage Christians in our walk with God in the midst of a hostile and evil world, which is bent on destroying all things that Christ stands for, by revealing just how foolish the world is, despite it being so convinced it is wiser than God, and even that God is evil, and they are righteous, in its utter blasphemy against God.

Family is the building block of society. This is evident from the teachings of the Bible on family, in its instructions of how to be wise and righteous:

For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth
(Hebrews 12:6)


Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it
(Proverbs 22:6)



A foolish son is the calamity of his father: and the contentions of a wife are a continual dropping (Proverbs 19:13)



 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.
25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
31 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.
32 This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
33 Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.
 (Ephesians 5:22-33)

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.

Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise;
That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth.
And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

(Ephesians 6:1-4)

These passages indicates the fundamental importance of family, as it is the institution that God has implemented for humankind to learn to walk in His ways, obey Him and serve Him.

As such, this is why satan seeks to attack the family, to cause destruction to millions of souls, by enabling him to totally grip people who were raise with no foundation in the ways of God. That is why. It is that simple.

Satan targets those who are susceptible to following him, more easily tempted by him. Note how he targets women and children. Note how Proverbs says that it is a foolish son or nagging wife who causes the father and husband to suffer. 

It is not the other way round where a father or husband first causes his child or wife to suffer. Why? Because it is the natural disposition of woman to be a curse to man: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee (Genesis 3:16). 

It is by Eve's actions that sin first came into the world, rather than by Adam's. No doubt, Adam sinned, but he followed his wife into sin, whereas she is the one who lead him to sin: 

And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. 
(Genesis 3:17-19)

The saying that woman is called 'woman' is because she brings woe to man. It is true is almost all cases, and not the other way round. When a man bring 'woe' to his wife, it is because she herself has caused it by her very desire to control her husband. This includes the desire to have opinions which bind her husband and children, or to be the one who exercises primary discipline over children. 

This is because both woman and children, are easily deceived spiritually, owing to their natural disposition to rebel, and seek sympathy from others, to manipulate them into feeling sympathetic for them, and therefore, unrighteously dismissing their evil, and even justifying it.

Children are easily deceived because they are naive and they are often influenced by their mother more than their father. They follow their mothers, and therefore undermine the authority of a husband and father, by virtue of obeying their mothers who rebel their husbands, and fathers of those children. She effectively uses children to undermine a husband's authority to rightly discipline children and his wife to rebel against him.

Satan has been successful in doing so. When was the last time you saw a woman or child being punished for his or her evil, in the true sense? I bet you never saw such punishment. Because women and children in the west are treated as though all things they do, no matter how evil, are justified, indicating satan has used them to make men fell into sin with women and children, by pandering to their carnal sympathy for them. 

That is why women and children need to be seriously disciplined and punished for their evil. Their evil needs to be seen for what it is, and addressed accordingly with just punishment, and not seen as "vulnerable"  people who are "bullied" by men, and therefore deserving of sympathy for their sins.

Rebellious women and rebellious children need to be treated as a criminal is, that is, shunned by society and suppressed, and who voices need to be ignored. That is the only way society can have righteous God-given order, which will not have the suffer the evils it does now.

For those who thought the feminist experiment was successful, look at what has happen. As the Bible says, "be sure your sin will find you out" (Numbers 32:23).